




I had a creative session this morning. I love what I do!
At the bottom, new ids for “depleted” and “saturated” that cement them as opposites — mutually supporting binary stars fixed solidly and brightly in my crystalline semantic firmament.
This is just one sense of “hurt”
Another sense of “hurt”:
Some id improvements I made this morning.
I got this book on Sanskrit because Ingo Swann, the famous remote viewer (and author of the entertaining book Penetration) recommended it — he thought learning Sanskrit would help a person develop telepathic abilities. Swann and Tyberg both apparently think that Sanskrit is literally “the language of the gods.” Maybe. I have fun trying to fathom and capture some of the concepts with ideograms.
A few ids that have come to me spontaneously, automatically, since last night
An example of how I try to encapsulate Truth in my ideograms.
Points: ids are expressive and useful. I won’t forget “Fazit” (conclusion) –ein zusammenfassendes Ergebnis. I wonder if “Fazit” is actually short for “zusammenfassend”? It fits, anyway.
As I have said often before, each word/idea is a problem and a challenge in how to represent it graphically. “Force” I find a very difficult concept to illustrate. “Something that tends to influence the motion of a body” is a definition I have read. But that is very vague and incomplete! If and when I come up with an effective, accurate id for “force” I’ll really think I have something. And I will.
Now I didn’t provide notes for the above. If anyone would like them, write to me.