My id for “question” above is a product of a considerable amount of effort over many years. See this page in my id dictionary, which I must revise one of these days. There are many hundreds of new ids to be entered–out with the old, in with the new! And this is perhaps the 20th edition of my dictionary.
Afterthoughts: on the other hand, I have poured a tremendous amount of conscious effort and work into making these ideograms; the short answer as to whether ids are a new language is “no, but they offer a huge possibility for change and move in that direction”
https://drjosephsuglia.com/2019/03/12/aphorisms-on-art/
Hail to the brilliant Dr. Joseph Suglia, who seems to have some appreciation of my work!
I may have already made a post on this a long time ago, I don’t remember. Anyway, ids have changed, so here’s a new one.
The id for “pi” is a good example of replacing a symbol that has no structural similarity to the facts referred to with one that does.
The proof is always in the pudding. Shortly after posting this I decided that in use I may like just using this passive voice indicator by itself, without the “is” verb. That will cause less confusion and put the emphasis in my mind on receptivity rather than being.
 | 4/17 | neoideograms on ideogram diary pages |
 | ErnieM on “SALIENT” without… |
 | austin_ep on “SALIENT” without… |
| ErnieM on ZENZEN SHIRIMASEN! |
 | jinnimagio on ZENZEN SHIRIMASEN! |
Ideograms for English. Creatively making English graphic.
